While talking to me on the phone last night, my buddy Jason stumbled up on the IE article on Wikipedia, and found out that my IE piece from last year is listed in the opinion section.

That enthuses me.

In fact, it enthuses me too much. It’s come to my attention that everyone who blogs has some degree of an ego problem, and I think it’s probably unhealthy. How does one balance wanting to post good content and be appreciated for doing so, with not being obsessive about it?

I mean, it’s easy to link-whore yourself all over the place, but then it’s just a hollow, lame feeling that you get when you see your name in lights. The coolest recognition is that which comes from passively being noticed. I say this, mind you, after having just posted my IPTABLES piece to my favorite forum in hopes that someone will tell me, “It’s great!”, or, “It really helped me!”.

So what does that make me? A psychopath? Perhaps. Alas, it feels good to help people learn stuff, and it feels good for people to say they liked what I wrote. My problem isn’t that it feels good, it’s that I am not comfortable with any degree of desire within myself to chase that feeling.

Oh well, I’ll continue on and hopefully not get swallowed up by it all. As for my friends, it’s incumbent on you to let me know if you feel me get out of hand. Hell, even if I don’t know you, email me and tell me — it’s the only humane thing to do.

-God

…or at least send them some hardware and some death-god DBAs. Everytime the site slows down I get a horrible sinking feeling in my stomach. At this point, if I were to lose everything I’ve put up there, I’d probably say screw it and become a luddite.

For anyone interested, I just posted my Netfilter/IPTABLES Basics piece to the Study portion of the site. Check it out if you’re into that sort of thing.

Netfilter/IPTABLES Basics

Here’s the fruit of my labor regarding a recent ink-oriented spam onslaught:

—snip—

pts rule name description

---

6.0 INKSUPPLIES BODY: Custom Rule - Ink Supply Spam 2.5 RCVDINXBL RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus XBL [218.82.191.69 listed in sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org] 0.6 URIBLSBL Contains an URL listed in the SBL blocklist [URIs: hughselected.com]

—snip—

I love handling my own mail…

Here’s what you do. You’re in the airport and you scope out one of the passengers who’s relaxing and waiting to get on the plane. You very quietly walk up to the chair where they’re reading the paper or whatever, and you just stop a few feet in front of them and stare in their direction. Eventually, they’ll feel that you’re there; when they look up, keep your face real blank (as if in a trance), and say in a monotone, “Don’t get on the plane…”

Then, just turn and walk slowly away. If they’re superstitious at all, they’ll likely think you were some sort of angel and freak the hell out.

**This is funny in the context of premonitions and psychic stuff — not terrorism. Well, even then it’s one of those things that’s funny as hell to think about but should never be done. But hopefully anyone reading this should know that…

I happened upon the newest release of 2600 today. I’ve been feeling lately as if the quality has been diminishing to some degree over the last year or so (I actually let my subscription lapse for precisely this reason), and was curious as to whether or not this was being addressed or not.

It seems it has not.

About halfway through the publication was an article on Adware — as in, Windows malware and how to get rid of it. I’m blown away by this. Don’t get me wrong, the write-up was decent; that’s not the issue. The problem is that this sort of piece, in my view anyway, belongs on Steve Gibson’s security site — not in 2600. It’s not low-class or lame to help newbies with their self-inflicted, Windows-based pain; it’s just that I didn’t know that’s what 2600 was about.

As many of you know, Phrack magazine closed up shop recently, and that was a sad day for many in the community. Arguably, though, it’s less sad than clinging to life via the continued publishing of weaker content. Phrack closed to preserve the legacy of what it was. Perhaps it’s time for 2600 to do the same.

Something struck me the other day that I think most power-users with experience on both Windows and OS X would agree with. Windows gets better as you tweak the hell out of it. Power-users on that OS invariably add this skin, this mod, that hack, etc.

On OS X, however, following that same paradigm does little more than create a kludgy feel to the system. It’s as if an equilibrium exists with the OS, and trying to make “improvements” somehow disturbs that balance. The bonsai tree comes to mind, as does the word shibumi — both focusing on minimalization and simplicity.

It’s not that I think OS X is perfect — it’s quite not; it’s just that it feels more like a complete environment than Windows does. Windows feels like a rickety, modular contraption that needs to be patched up, have holes filled, and functionality added. OS X feels more like a self-contained product…it’s hard to describe.

I do still add a couple of things to my OS installs (LaunchBar for one), but it’s nothing like what I do to a Windows box when I first get a hold of it. With the latter, there’s like a whole list of tools and mods that needs to go on the box before it’s even considered usable. That’s not the case with OS X, and it’s worth noting.

For all those who’ve been having legitimate conversations with me on the topic of ink cartridges, I’m afraid we’re no longer going to be able to do so. Blame the spammers.

Here’s the Spamassassin rule I wrote for this crap, if anyone’s interested; I named it 90_ink.cf and placed it in /usr/share/spamassassin along with the other rules.:

---

# User-Defined Spamassassin Rule For Ink-related Content

Daniel Miessler

02.26.05

body INKSUPPLIES /\bink (?:supplies|cartridges|toner)/i describe INKSUPPLIES Custom Rule - Ink Supply Spam

---

From there, you just add an entry like the one below to your /etc/spamassassin/local.cf file (salt to taste):

# Custom Score Modification score INK_SUPPLIES 6.00

“According to Yale Information Technology Services’ registration records, nearly 20 percent of University students and 33 percent of faculty choose Macs over Windows PCs.”

I’ve seen the question asked more than a few times recently about what the best information security certifications are. Some people already have one or more and are looking to expand, others are just getting started and want to know how to do so. This page will hopefully offer some help in this area. I’m going to highlight a few of the options and discuss who I think should be going for which, and why.

I’ll be rating each one based on the criteria below:

*Note: I only have the Security+, CISSP, and GSEC credentials. My comments on the others are based on information I have gathered from various sources.

Difficulty - How hard the test itself is, i.e. study-time neeeded, etc. Who - Who should be looking at this as an option. Respect - Technical respect rating within the infosec-geek community. Renown - How well-know the certificate is throughout the industry. Requirements - What’s needed to get the cert, i.e. project, exam, etc. Cost: - What it’ll cost you (or your company) to sit for the exam. Pros - Positive comments about the certification. Cons - Downsides to the certification. Comments - My own input about the credential. *Note: Numbers are on a scale from 1-10 (10 being the highest)

The Players

Security+ Sponsor: CompTIA Difficulty: 1 Respectability: 2 Renown: 4 Requirements: Single Exam, +-100 Questions Cost: $225 USD (discounts available online) Who: This certification is for people just getting into the field. If you don’t have any other certifications, and your experience/skills are still developing, this is the certification for you. Pros: It’s a fairly easy cert to get and I understand it’s getting a decent amount of recognition within federal organizations. It’s also a fair, solid test that asks decent questions rather than a bunch of fluff. Cons: It’s entry-level and thus not strong as a standalone bargaining chip.

SSCP (Systems Security Certified Practitioner) Sponsor: ISC² Difficulty: 4 Respectability: 4 Renown: 2 Requirements: Single Exam, 125 Questions Cost: $350 USD Who: The SSCP is for serious, dedicated information security professionals who are not quite ready to take the CISSP exam. Only one (1) year of experience is required for this exam vs. 3-4 (depending on if you have your degree) for the CISSP. Pros: The SSCP is administered in a very professional fashion, just like the CISSP, and it thus carries some degree of the respect that goes along with that credential. It’s also from ISC² just like the CISSP, so that helps it as well. Cons: Unfortunately, the certification that hurts the SSCP the most is in fact its older brother — the CISSP. If you check the job boards, precious few jobs ask for the SSCP. The reasoning there is that the experience requirement for the CISSP is much of what makes it so respectable. To take that away and ask half the number of questions diminishes the SSCP to a significant degree. Comments: If you can’t show the 3-4 years experience required for the CISSP, and someone else is paying, I’d say go for the SSCP. If nothing else, it will help prepare you for the CISSP that will surely be in your future. That being said, if you want to get a truly valuable credential that doesn’t require the experience, opt for the GSEC (covered below).

CISSP (Certified Information Systems Security Professional) Sponsor: ISC² Difficulty: 5 Respectability: 5 Renown: 10 Requirements: Single Exam, 250 Questions Cost: $500 USD Who: The CISSP is for serious, dedicated information security professionals who intend to stay in the field and grow. It says to employers that you are serious about your career and are familiar with the core basics of 10 seperate areas within the field. Pros: The CISSP is without a doubt the king of certifications right now. It’s the first infosec cert to recieve ISO recognition — a great acheivment not only for the certification itself, but also for the field as a whole. It commands a great deal of respect in many IT circles, and this can be clearly seen via job search results. It can help your chances greatly of getting high-paying jobs, and is an excellent addition to any resume. If you are only going to get one infosec cert, it should be the CISSP. Cons: While the CISSP is undoubtedly the king of information security certifications, it suffers from being thought of as something it isn’t. Many view it as proof that someone is an expert in the field, and that couldn’t be farther from the truth. ISC² has explicitly stated in the past that the test is designed to test a broad base of general knowledge, not to certify someone as a master of their field. Despite the rumors of impossibility, the exam also supports over a 70% first-time pass rate. Comments: The CISSP is a great exam because it is not easy to take (experience in the field is required ), and once you are able to take it, it’s administered in a professional, controlled environment. What people fail to realize is that it’s for high-level security professionals such as managers. Obviously, anyone can go for it, but it’s not designed to test technical skills or the ability to actually perform in the trenches of an infosec environment. It’s a broad overview, basically — a test designed to ensure that you are familiar with some concepts. It’s when people lose sight of this that the confusion starts. As for the difficulty factor, I started studying for mine on a Monday and passed the exam on that Saturday — that’s with zero previous exposure to the CISSP study material. A buddy of mine just got his as well, and his study consisted of around 2 weeks of passively glancing at the material while leveling his WoW character. Again, that’s not to say it’s not an excellent cert, it’s just that the difficulty should not be overestimated.

GSEC (General Security Essentials Certification) Sponsor: SANS Difficulty: 7 Respectability: 7 Renown: 5 Requirements: Research Paper, Two 100-Question Exams Cost: $800 USD (Cost of exam without training) Who: The GSEC is for highly-technical, serious information security professionals who actively work with infosec technology on a day to day basis. Those who are looking to show considerable technical knowledge over a large number of infosec subjects would be well-served by attaining this credential. Pros: The SANS organization is universally recognized as a top-notch infosec organization. Any certification from them commands a decent degree of respect. Cons: The CISSP currently owns the majority of the spotlight in this arena. Few employers are aware of the GSEC, and even if they are they view the CISSP as just as valuable. Comments: The GSEC does not show expertise in a given subject; it shows that the cert-holder is technically-oriented and has a wide base of infosec knowledge. No certs at this level demonstrate true mastery. One particular thing to note with this exam vs. the CISSP is that the actual exam portions are taken from home and open-book, meaning you can use anything you want during the exams. Critics rave that this makes the exam less respectable than the CISSP since the CISSP is taken under supervision and no study materials may be used. I argue that precisely the opposite is true. Infosec professionals are not databases. We don’t pride ourselves in not having to consult external resources when solving problems; in fact, we do it constantly. To imply that an exam that tests your ability to solve problems in precisely this fashion is somehow less respectable is, in my view, a grave mistake. The GSEC exam structure represents the real world — you’re faced with a difficult problem, you find the answer and solve it. You don’t see consultants losing contracts because they had to Google for solutions that saved their clients money. Ultimately this debate comes down to an old argument: hands-on vs. academic. When evaluating someone that’s supposed to have the actual know-how to solve infosec problems in the real world, there’s no doubt in my mind that the average manager is going to prefer the former.

GCFW, GCIA, GCUX, GCIH Sponsor: SANS Difficulty: 8-9 Respectability: 8-9 Renown: 4 Requirements: Research Paper, One Or More Exams Cost: $800 USD (Cost of exam without training) Who: These various SANS certs are the mid-level offerings from the organization. They are more indepth and difficult than the GSEC, and they focus on one area specifically. GCFW is for firewalls and VPNs. GCIA is for IDS/IPS, GCUX is for Unix security, and GCIH is for incident handling. These are just a few of those that are offered, and these are geared towards veteran infosec professionals who have already specialized into an area. If you fit this bill, I’d say that pursuing one of these certifications would be ideal. Pros: The SANS organization is universally recognized as a top-notch infosec organization. Any certification from them commands a decent degree of respect, and these specialized certs say to an employer or client that you are truly profficient at what you do. Cons: There are very few holders of these more advanced certifications, and as such many employers may ask questions like, “Is that like a CISSP? Is that the same as a GSEC?” The good news is that it should be fairly easy to explain the situation to them. Comments: These certifications do show some degree of mastery of a subject. It doesn’t mean that everyone with one is great, or that those who don’t have it aren’t. It does mean, however, that the odds of someone with one of these certifications being a good fit for a job in that area are extremely high. Think of these as more difficult, more focused GSECs.

CISA (Certified Information Systems Auditor) Sponsor: ISACA Difficulty: 5-6 ? Respectability: 6 Renown: 8 Requirements: Single Exam Who: The CISA credential is ideal for anyone already doing, or looking at getting into information security auditing. Pros: The credential is highly recognized and sports even more hits than the CISSP in monster.com and other job searches. It’s highly sought after due to the onslaught of regulation hitting the infosec industry as a whole. Cons: Again, many jobs that request CISA also will take a CISSP. Certain jobs ask for CISA specifically, but most are just looking for this “class” of cert, and will accept a CISSP in its place. Comments: This area (auditing) is growing like mad. Due to SOX and other new legislation, this will do nothing but continue to accelerate. Adding a CISA to your resume is definitely a good move.

GSE (GIAC Security Expert) Sponsor: SANS Difficulty: 10 Respectability: 10 Renown: 3 Requirements: You must currently have five (5) GIAC certs (one of which must be with honors), and then pass the GSE exam. Who: The GSE is something to be pursued by those who have literally mastered a number of areas within information security, and have superior talent. Pros: If you encounter anyone who knows what all the exam involves, you’ll earn some instant respect. Cons: You aren’t likely to find any of those people. Comments: The GSE credential is the final destination for anyone pursuing certification with information security. It’s a goal in and of itself to me since I don’t see someone with the skills to attain it hurting for a job or having trouble getting raises.

Boiled Down

Let me try and break it down the way I see it. If you are just getting into security and you don’t have much experience with networking and such, get a job where you can work with computers and start pursuing your CCNA. Study, practice, learn everything you can pertaining to operating systems, networking, and security. Once you feel your skills are fairly strong in the security realm, start studying for and take the Security+ exam.

If you have been in networking and/or security for a while now (4 years or so), and you feel your skills are pretty strong, you should be looking at the CISSP. Ignore people who say it’s too easy or that it doesn’t mean much — it doesn’t matter. The fact of the matter is that it’s more beneficial to have a CISSP right now than any other cert in its class.

After getting your CISSP, and if you’re a technical person, I suggest you look at the GSEC. It’s the perfect compliment to the CISSP. The CISSP covers the 10 domains from a manager/birds-eye view, and the GSEC gets down to some technical detail within the same areas of study — policy, encryption, etc.

Another option once you have your CISSP is to go for the CISA instead. If you’re more of a manager anyway, and/or looking to head that way, then it may not be necessary to show technical prowess. If that’s the case then opt for the CISA instead of the GSEC. The certification is absolutely on fire right now, and the odds are good that with a solid resume and a CISSP/CISA combination you could command around $90K/U.S. fairly easily.

If you have been in infosec for a long time, i.e. 5-10 years or more, and you are a geek at the core, start knocking down SANS certs being aware of the fact that you need honors for one of the 5 that are required for the GSE. To me, the GSE is a major accomplishment in its own right, and I don’t really see it being a money-maker. In my view, anyone who can get a GSE already pulls a healthy check anyway.

Conclusion

I hope this short summary of my thoughts on these credentials has been helpful. Feel free to contact me if I have made any errors, if there is something you think I should add, or if you just want to comment on anything said.: