<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: An Infosec Prediction: More Human-Based Attacks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dmiessler.com/blog/an-infosec-prediction-more-human-based-attacks/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dmiessler.com/blog/an-infosec-prediction-more-human-based-attacks</link>
	<description>in search of intervals</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 13:40:44 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7-bleeding</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mark Cunningham</title>
		<link>http://dmiessler.com/blog/an-infosec-prediction-more-human-based-attacks#comment-208150</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Cunningham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 20:59:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmiessler.com/blog/an-infosec-prediction-more-human-based-attacks#comment-208150</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I am very intrigued by this position that you stipulate. One reason being I am an IT guy and the other, I consider myself immune to either form of coercion. 
      I sum it up to the reality that if this scenario presents itself to me I will be in a very tricky situation which will ultimately result in my death. Considering the loyalty that I present to any establishment that I associate myself with, I would not be inclined to act against it. Secondly, I can not be threatened or manipulated by means of acts of violence against my loved ones or asset. (Especially since I have no assets.)
     I am a firm believer in the "kill the hostages" policy that I coined upon learning about worldly events such as the weapons transport that was seized by terrorists a few days ago of the coast of Africa. If I were in charge, several cruise missiles would have found their way to that ship immediately after verifying that a terrorist seizure had in fact taken place. 
     If I ever got the phone call that went like this, "Hi Mark. We have your wife here with a gun to her head and you have one day to upload the virus to your company's network...." My response would succinctly and cleverly entail, " You can have it your way, Dr. Venkman. Shoot the bitch, I will not be pawed at." and hang up the phone.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am very intrigued by this position that you stipulate. One reason being I am an IT guy and the other, I consider myself immune to either form of coercion. 
      I sum it up to the reality that if this scenario presents itself to me I will be in a very tricky situation which will ultimately result in my death. Considering the loyalty that I present to any establishment that I associate myself with, I would not be inclined to act against it. Secondly, I can not be threatened or manipulated by means of acts of violence against my loved ones or asset. (Especially since I have no assets.)
     I am a firm believer in the &#8220;kill the hostages&#8221; policy that I coined upon learning about worldly events such as the weapons transport that was seized by terrorists a few days ago of the coast of Africa. If I were in charge, several cruise missiles would have found their way to that ship immediately after verifying that a terrorist seizure had in fact taken place. 
     If I ever got the phone call that went like this, &#8220;Hi Mark. We have your wife here with a gun to her head and you have one day to upload the virus to your company&#8217;s network&#8230;.&#8221; My response would succinctly and cleverly entail, &#8221; You can have it your way, Dr. Venkman. Shoot the bitch, I will not be pawed at.&#8221; and hang up the phone.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Eckstrom</title>
		<link>http://dmiessler.com/blog/an-infosec-prediction-more-human-based-attacks#comment-135099</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Eckstrom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 23:28:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmiessler.com/blog/an-infosec-prediction-more-human-based-attacks#comment-135099</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Say... has this happened to you?
Sounds just a touch to probable to be fiction. Yikes.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Say&#8230; has this happened to you?
Sounds just a touch to probable to be fiction. Yikes.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maxo</title>
		<link>http://dmiessler.com/blog/an-infosec-prediction-more-human-based-attacks#comment-135006</link>
		<dc:creator>Maxo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 11:56:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmiessler.com/blog/an-infosec-prediction-more-human-based-attacks#comment-135006</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I think option two is the most likely, and should already be practiced at any company that is large enough.
However, $50K does sound like a tempting offer ...&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think option two is the most likely, and should already be practiced at any company that is large enough.
However, $50K does sound like a tempting offer &#8230;</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
