Contemplating My Support for Obama
By Daniel Miessler on June 27th, 2008: Tagged as America | Obama

My support for Obama has been wavering somewhat in recent weeks. He seems to have sacrificed his positions on the FISA bill, public financing, and a few other issues. The most important of these is his tough talk on Iran when he’s around a crowd that wants to hear it. In short, he’s looking more and more like a standard politician.
He covers this very topic in his book, however, and I’m quite aware of the fact that every political decision involves some sort of compromise, but I still don’t like it. The problem is, I am unsure of how important it is. In other words, I know that without him playing this game the way he is he would not be where he is now.
But those compromises aren’t the only problem. It’s also the policies I disagree with him on that he hasn’t waffled on. Gun control. Immigration. And I’m not sure how I feel about socialized medicine. I know there is value to socializing certain things, but I’m not sure how much of this is good for us at this stage in our development.
For
So let’s do it this way: let me tell you why I like Obama. And these are going to be “feelings” I have, which are subject to all sorts of biases and media trickery. So keep that in mind.
- Honesty. He speaks the most from the heart of any candidate that I’ve ever watched closely, with Paul and Kucinich being his only peers.
- He listens to people. I like Presidents who surround themselves with smart people and actually listen to them.
- His technology position. He’s supposedly for net neutrality, which is great, and transparent government is even more important to me. I also like his concept of a CTO for America.
- I like his energy policy, i.e. one that’s focused on alternative engery and doesn’t dismiss safe Nuclear as part of the portfolio.
- I think he can help us regain respect for our country on the world stage. The world senses his honesty and his willingness to talk through problems (even with his “enemies”), and this regaining of our respect will help all aspects of our country’s health.
Against
- If he’s too extreme he’ll get marginalized just like Ron Paul would.
- If enough of the country is bigoted they’ll hate him just for not being white, and that lens of dislike will be used to distort any good he will do. But this is a problem with America, not with him.
- I want to see harsh penalties placed on businesses that hire and support illegal immigrants. I want to raise wages for blue collar jobs by changing the labor market to include more Americans. This means fewer illegal Mexicans. I don’t think Obama agrees.
- I haven’t seen him do anything courageous with respect to immigration or national identity, e.g. supporting English as the official language. This bothers me. He seems more likely to embrace unification of Mexico through a slow, gentle legalization process. And this is consistent with CFR goals. I see this as an ideal, perhaps decades or centuries in the future, but I think it’d be guaranteed disaster in the world we live in now.
- I think American citizens should be allowed to carry handguns to protect themselves. I don’t think the forefathers envisioned a society where Americans’ only defenses against an assailant using deadly force would be to call the police (see government). In fact, I think they had precisely the opposite idea. The government is there to help in a limited fashion, not to nanny us. If we are attacked we should have the right to defend ourselves. That’s the entire basis of personal freedom and responsibility.
Conclusions
These are just a few thoughts on the matter. The basic idea here is that I’m not sure Obama, for all his strengths, is going to be the right guy. I still think he’s likely the best guy (and he’s way better than McCain for sure), but the options of Bob Bar (Libertarian) or writing in Ron Paul are starting to become more attractive to me.
I hate to go back and forth on this crucial issue of who to vote for in such a public manner. I was for Ron Paul at first, and now I’m for Obama — but I’m having second thoughts. I considered not posting this for fear of appearing shallow.
But fuck that. I’m not going to apologize for being thoughtful and willing to change my mind when I deem it appropriate to do so. I will continue to do this — even at the expense of looking shallow.
Most anyone who’s thoughtful and has views that anything like my own is facing a tough choice this election. Obama could do a massive amount of good on the foreign front, but will his immigration and health care policies harm us more? Voting for Barr or Paul is a good option as well, but is it better to put your vote where it has the most chance of countering McCain?
These are not easy questions, and I look forward to hearing what your thoughts are on the matter.:
--

I usually agree with you on political issues, but I have to question your reasoning that English should be the national language. It’s my opinion that America is a country of borrowed culture, and that just because the majority of the population speaks English, doesn’t mean that the residents a state with another language more widely spoken should be forced to speak our lanuage. I’d love to hear from you about this, perhaps in another blog post?
Comment by Richard Neal — 6/28/2008 @ 1:07 am
Perhaps I’ll do a full post on it at some point, but here’s my main position:
I’m not promoting the idea that nobody should be allowed to speak other languages, only that English should be the official language. That means legal matters, civil matters, public interfaces to government functions, etc. It should be English. ATMs, phone menus, etc.
This isn’t to say that other languages shouldn’t be available in many situations, but the primary interface should be English.
The reasons for this is that the various groups who are in our country don’t like each other. We don’t want Balkanization. We don’t want separate groups within our country. We want a single, unified group that includes those who used to live in other countries. We want Americans, including people who used to NOT be Americans.
See my post on the melting pot for a better explanation for how I see immigration and culture-mixing in our country.
But the main point I’m making is that a fragmented country is a dying country. We have to be one people, and a big part of that is the official language.
Comment by Daniel Miessler — 6/28/2008 @ 1:22 am
At this point in time I am going to write in Alan Keys for the office of the President.
Comment by Dave Largo — 6/28/2008 @ 2:24 am
So you’re just figuring out Obama is a politician just like the rest? He’s unqualified and power-hungry.
Comment by dale — 6/28/2008 @ 3:40 am
You know what might be interested, and help firm your decision in either direction, is consider what is most important (and realistic) for you to have happen in the next four years.
What issues are the most important and in need of immediate attention. (For instance, I don’t really see Obama’s view on gun control having any relevance in the next few years, I doubt much will happen with that, given everything else going on)
So then, doesn’t it seem like our rejoining the world stage is an immediate need. Doesn’t his view on the war seem more important (for the next four years anyway) than the handling of illegal immigration? (Though it IS important, I’d rather have a new energy policy with safe nuclear plants being built again before anything else)
Maybe if you look at it that way, in what is most pressing for us as a country, you might see the benefits of voting for Obama to ensure there is no such thing as a President McCain.
Comment by md — 6/28/2008 @ 4:29 am
interesting*
Comment by md — 6/28/2008 @ 4:30 am
http://www.videobomb.com/index/democracyemail?url=http%3A//www.archive.org/download/dn2008-0618vid/dn2008-0618256kb.mp4&title=Democracy%20Now!%202008-06-18%20Wednesday You should watch the above interview with Ralph Nader. I don’t think I’m nearly as cynical about Obama as Nader, he certainly raises many good points.
Comment by Maxo — 6/30/2008 @ 4:45 am