<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dumping Safari. Going to Camino.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dmiessler.com/blog/dumping-safari-going-to-camino/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dmiessler.com/blog/dumping-safari-going-to-camino</link>
	<description>in search of intervals</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 04:38:47 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7-RC1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tim F.</title>
		<link>http://dmiessler.com/blog/dumping-safari-going-to-camino/comment-page-1#comment-84218</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim F.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 00:31:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmiessler.com/blogarchive/dumping-safari-going-to-camino#comment-84218</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Monkey see, monkey do...  So I downloaded Camino and gave it a shot.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I like the fact that there's a flash blocker built in.  I loved the firefox extension... and the built-in tab preferences seem to be a little more robust.  The selling point, though, was Keychain integration.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Now here's two things I don't like about it:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Two of my favorite add-ons (aardvark and Foxmarks) are not available for  Camino.  I can deal with not having aardvark, and maybe at some point I can figure out how to write a "Camilinks" add-on that would be similar to foxmarks.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Then I have the problem with google reader that Daniel was fussing about before -- when I view an article, the tab comes to focus, which takes me away from my reader session (regardless of how I set the "Load in background" option).  It's rather annoying.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;So much for that.  I'm using Camino for this post and I probably won't use it again for a while, but I'm not going to remove it from my laptop.  I think if I could figure out the reader problem and write that Camilinks addon, It would kick ass.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Monkey see, monkey do&#8230;  So I downloaded Camino and gave it a shot.</p>

<p>I like the fact that there&#8217;s a flash blocker built in.  I loved the firefox extension&#8230; and the built-in tab preferences seem to be a little more robust.  The selling point, though, was Keychain integration.</p>

<p>Now here&#8217;s two things I don&#8217;t like about it:</p>

<p>Two of my favorite add-ons (aardvark and Foxmarks) are not available for  Camino.  I can deal with not having aardvark, and maybe at some point I can figure out how to write a &#8220;Camilinks&#8221; add-on that would be similar to foxmarks.</p>

<p>Then I have the problem with google reader that Daniel was fussing about before &#8212; when I view an article, the tab comes to focus, which takes me away from my reader session (regardless of how I set the &#8220;Load in background&#8221; option).  It&#8217;s rather annoying.</p>

<p>So much for that.  I&#8217;m using Camino for this post and I probably won&#8217;t use it again for a while, but I&#8217;m not going to remove it from my laptop.  I think if I could figure out the reader problem and write that Camilinks addon, It would kick ass.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maxo</title>
		<link>http://dmiessler.com/blog/dumping-safari-going-to-camino/comment-page-1#comment-83827</link>
		<dc:creator>Maxo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 12:24:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmiessler.com/blogarchive/dumping-safari-going-to-camino#comment-83827</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Is the problem that Word Press is not W3C compliant or that Safari is not properly rending the code?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is the problem that Word Press is not W3C compliant or that Safari is not properly rending the code?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake Dahn</title>
		<link>http://dmiessler.com/blog/dumping-safari-going-to-camino/comment-page-1#comment-83458</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake Dahn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Sep 2007 00:34:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmiessler.com/blogarchive/dumping-safari-going-to-camino#comment-83458</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I've gone back and forth between camino and safari for about 2 years now. I generally would use the camino nightlies which would break and send me back to safari, then safari would do something wrong so I'd go back to a newer nightly.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The reason I don't use firefox is because I'm on a ppc mac, and it's horribly and slow. I do believe that in firefox 3 they're adding cocoa widgets, so it should be just as fast as camino with the rest of the firefox goodness.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;As for flock, it's not light at all, it's firefox with extra extensions. I did ~6 months of volunteer QA for them when they had spirit, back in the day :D&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve gone back and forth between camino and safari for about 2 years now. I generally would use the camino nightlies which would break and send me back to safari, then safari would do something wrong so I&#8217;d go back to a newer nightly.</p>

<p>The reason I don&#8217;t use firefox is because I&#8217;m on a ppc mac, and it&#8217;s horribly and slow. I do believe that in firefox 3 they&#8217;re adding cocoa widgets, so it should be just as fast as camino with the rest of the firefox goodness.</p>

<p>As for flock, it&#8217;s not light at all, it&#8217;s firefox with extra extensions. I did ~6 months of volunteer QA for them when they had spirit, back in the day :D</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vishnu</title>
		<link>http://dmiessler.com/blog/dumping-safari-going-to-camino/comment-page-1#comment-83390</link>
		<dc:creator>Vishnu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Sep 2007 18:44:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmiessler.com/blogarchive/dumping-safari-going-to-camino#comment-83390</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;You can also try flock.you will find it light and pleasing.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can also try flock.you will find it light and pleasing.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Henshaw</title>
		<link>http://dmiessler.com/blog/dumping-safari-going-to-camino/comment-page-1#comment-83380</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Henshaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Sep 2007 18:06:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmiessler.com/blogarchive/dumping-safari-going-to-camino#comment-83380</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Ha! All I can say is been there, done that (several times). I predict you will be back on Firefox within a month -- 2 months max ;)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ha! All I can say is been there, done that (several times). I predict you will be back on Firefox within a month &#8212; 2 months max ;)</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
