<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Signing with Initials</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dmiessler.com/blog/signing-with-initials/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dmiessler.com/blog/signing-with-initials</link>
	<description>in search of intervals</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 07:22:01 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7-RC1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Miessler</title>
		<link>http://dmiessler.com/blog/signing-with-initials/comment-page-1#comment-149376</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Miessler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 03:43:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmiessler.com/blog/signing-with-initials#comment-149376</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;LOL, nice comment, md.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL, nice comment, md.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: md</title>
		<link>http://dmiessler.com/blog/signing-with-initials/comment-page-1#comment-149355</link>
		<dc:creator>md</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 02:04:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmiessler.com/blog/signing-with-initials#comment-149355</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I hope you didn't think I was pompous when sending you emails!&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I use md as my signature and name for a lot of reasons.  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;p&gt;I hate my last name. Dudlik. Its terrible. (dud-lick. not dude-lick, but still bad)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;p&gt;my website/email address show my name. Mark is common enough.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;p&gt;md makes me seem like i might be a doctor. (kidding)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I dont use all my initials because then i'd spell out mad. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I think its just a shorthand that can simplify things. I will sign
Mark on first time or more formal emails, usually. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Ive been consistent enough with md that some people just call me that offline now too.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;What I would find more pompous is people who use their entire names (and have numbers)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Thanks
Mark Anthony Dudlik II &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;(seriously, worst name ever)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope you didn&#8217;t think I was pompous when sending you emails!</p>

<p>I use md as my signature and name for a lot of reasons.  </p>

<ol>
<li><p>I hate my last name. Dudlik. Its terrible. (dud-lick. not dude-lick, but still bad)</p></li>
<li><p>my website/email address show my name. Mark is common enough.</p></li>
<li><p>md makes me seem like i might be a doctor. (kidding)</p></li>
</ol>

<p>I dont use all my initials because then i&#8217;d spell out mad. </p>

<p>I think its just a shorthand that can simplify things. I will sign
Mark on first time or more formal emails, usually. </p>

<p>Ive been consistent enough with md that some people just call me that offline now too.</p>

<p>What I would find more pompous is people who use their entire names (and have numbers)</p>

<p>Thanks
Mark Anthony Dudlik II </p>

<p>(seriously, worst name ever)</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven G. Harms</title>
		<link>http://dmiessler.com/blog/signing-with-initials/comment-page-1#comment-149204</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven G. Harms</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 14:27:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmiessler.com/blog/signing-with-initials#comment-149204</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Agggggghhh. Need preview function for comments.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agggggghhh. Need preview function for comments.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven G. Harms</title>
		<link>http://dmiessler.com/blog/signing-with-initials/comment-page-1#comment-149203</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven G. Harms</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 14:26:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmiessler.com/blog/signing-with-initials#comment-149203</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;DM&lt;/strong&gt; is better because he thinks you are either &lt;strong&gt;D&lt;/strong&gt;anger&lt;strong&gt;M&lt;/strong&gt;ouse or &lt;strong&gt;Dungeon&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Master&lt;/strong&gt;: either of which are inexpressably cool ( especially with the D&#38;D 4.0 release later this month ).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;But to address the question there are indeed different standards of communication&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Hacker
My name's in the from field, my email address is in the from field, what's the point of salutation?  Just send the message and be done. Think of all the precious bits you slaughter with you antiquated formality (Lenin would have loved high-tech).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Hacker trying to convince someone
Adopt the formalities of Dear &lt;em&gt;Blank&lt;/em&gt; / ...Thomas J. Hacker&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Manager
All formalities, all the time, unless talking to staff and using the non-countable address "Team:".&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Middle-Manager
Manager + Themed Graphic Stationary&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Senior Manager
Middle-Manager plus photo in header bar&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Engineering Manager
See Hacker&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;CEO
Someone else writes my emails for me.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>DM</strong> is better because he thinks you are either <strong>D</strong>anger<strong>M</strong>ouse or <strong>Dungeon</strong><strong>Master</strong>: either of which are inexpressably cool ( especially with the D&amp;D 4.0 release later this month ).</p>

<p>But to address the question there are indeed different standards of communication</p>

<p>Hacker
My name&#8217;s in the from field, my email address is in the from field, what&#8217;s the point of salutation?  Just send the message and be done. Think of all the precious bits you slaughter with you antiquated formality (Lenin would have loved high-tech).</p>

<p>Hacker trying to convince someone
Adopt the formalities of Dear <em>Blank</em> / &#8230;Thomas J. Hacker</p>

<p>Manager
All formalities, all the time, unless talking to staff and using the non-countable address &#8220;Team:&#8221;.</p>

<p>Middle-Manager
Manager + Themed Graphic Stationary</p>

<p>Senior Manager
Middle-Manager plus photo in header bar</p>

<p>Engineering Manager
See Hacker</p>

<p>CEO
Someone else writes my emails for me.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Miessler</title>
		<link>http://dmiessler.com/blog/signing-with-initials/comment-page-1#comment-148885</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Miessler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2008 14:01:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmiessler.com/blog/signing-with-initials#comment-148885</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Interesting.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;So the general theme of the responses makes sense -- add additional signature information as the formality of the message increases.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Arthur, why is DM better than drm? Capitalization? Or the negative association with Digital Rights Management?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting.</p>

<p>So the general theme of the responses makes sense &#8212; add additional signature information as the formality of the message increases.</p>

<p>Arthur, why is DM better than drm? Capitalization? Or the negative association with Digital Rights Management?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arthur Doohan</title>
		<link>http://dmiessler.com/blog/signing-with-initials/comment-page-1#comment-148854</link>
		<dc:creator>Arthur Doohan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2008 11:46:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmiessler.com/blog/signing-with-initials#comment-148854</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;A signature on a letter (along w the address) served to identify the sender - in an email that requirement is already fulfilled so unless ones email address is somehow obscure (dm25@hotmail.com) or not intuitable then "Daniel" conveys no extra info.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Formality (manners, etiquette, customs) serve to smooth interactions between strangers - therefore the amount of formality indicates the lack of trust between two parties. Inapproriate formality creates barriers.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;But for you "DM" or "D" is way better than "drm"&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;AD&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A signature on a letter (along w the address) served to identify the sender - in an email that requirement is already fulfilled so unless ones email address is somehow obscure (dm25@hotmail.com) or not intuitable then &#8220;Daniel&#8221; conveys no extra info.</p>

<p>Formality (manners, etiquette, customs) serve to smooth interactions between strangers - therefore the amount of formality indicates the lack of trust between two parties. Inapproriate formality creates barriers.</p>

<p>But for you &#8220;DM&#8221; or &#8220;D&#8221; is way better than &#8220;drm&#8221;</p>

<p>AD</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doc Rice</title>
		<link>http://dmiessler.com/blog/signing-with-initials/comment-page-1#comment-148736</link>
		<dc:creator>Doc Rice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2008 01:36:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmiessler.com/blog/signing-with-initials#comment-148736</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I've come to the point where I don't even use a signature when sending internal company e-mail to folks I normally interact with.  None of that, "Hi John," and ending with, "Thanks, Bob."  The formality feels unnecessary and artificial, plus it physically makes e-mail threads longer to parse.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;That said, I'd agree most would use initials as a short-hand because it's easier.  Sending something to an official contact outside the company would require the complete diplomatic package - full name, company logo and all.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve come to the point where I don&#8217;t even use a signature when sending internal company e-mail to folks I normally interact with.  None of that, &#8220;Hi John,&#8221; and ending with, &#8220;Thanks, Bob.&#8221;  The formality feels unnecessary and artificial, plus it physically makes e-mail threads longer to parse.</p>

<p>That said, I&#8217;d agree most would use initials as a short-hand because it&#8217;s easier.  Sending something to an official contact outside the company would require the complete diplomatic package - full name, company logo and all.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy L. Gaddis</title>
		<link>http://dmiessler.com/blog/signing-with-initials/comment-page-1#comment-148670</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy L. Gaddis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2008 20:14:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmiessler.com/blog/signing-with-initials#comment-148670</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I have:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;"Thanks,
-j"&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;as the first part of my signature, just because I'm lazy, but depending on who I'm e-mailing I'll often remove the -j and put my name in (too be a bit more "formal").&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I know lots of others who do the same.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have:</p>

<p>&#8220;Thanks,
-j&#8221;</p>

<p>as the first part of my signature, just because I&#8217;m lazy, but depending on who I&#8217;m e-mailing I&#8217;ll often remove the -j and put my name in (too be a bit more &#8220;formal&#8221;).</p>

<p>I know lots of others who do the same.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrian Bool</title>
		<link>http://dmiessler.com/blog/signing-with-initials/comment-page-1#comment-148660</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian Bool</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2008 19:19:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmiessler.com/blog/signing-with-initials#comment-148660</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;'Digital Rights Management'... Don't you currently feel sufficiently hated? ;-)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;Digital Rights Management&#8217;&#8230; Don&#8217;t you currently feel sufficiently hated? ;-)</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
