The Real Reason MacWorld Didn’t Have Anything About Leopard
By Daniel Miessler on January 29th, 2007: Tagged as Apple | Leopard | Microsoft | OS X | Vista | Windows
…he was waiting for Microsoft to have their fun with Vista. Only then will they reveal what they’ve really been doing with Leopard. It’s like poker, you want to be the last one to act.
I expect a repeat of what happened with the iPod and the Zune:
Microsoft: And we present to you the Zune! Now with a wannabe iPod interface! Apple: LOL, we’re doing touch-screens, dumbass. Nice wheel, though…your idea?
So my thought is that Apple is waiting to spring another identical trap on Microsoft. Notice how quiet they’ve been about Leopard for all this time? Nothing at MacWorld — nothing since then. They’re letting Microsoft have its day because they know precisely what Vista has to offer. Steve has all the information and is basically setting them up for complete failure.
As soon as the buzz dies down from Vista, they’re doing to bust out with their equivalent of what the iPhone was to the Zune. In other words, something to make all the Microsoft fanboys who just bought Vista say, “Damn, I hate Apple…Why couldn’t Microsoft do that!?! I should have bought a Mac…”
I don’t know what Apple’s going to do with Leopard that’s going to make Vista look silly, but I have a very strong feeling it’s going to be something major in the UI arena. Hell, I just hope it involves replacing Finder.:
Related Posts
- Windows Vista: AKA Windows 95 Version 3 or 4
- Microsoft's Defense Of Vista: The *Next* Version Will Be Really, Really Cool...
- Windows Vista Will Make People Buy OS X
- Leopard Instead of Vista: Three Reasons Why Your Next Computer Should Be A Mac
- Vista Security A Joke? : Executables Install As Administrator Because It's More Convenient
- Powered by Contextual Related Posts
